Skip to main content
Log in

Dispersive SPE, an alternative to traditional SPE for extraction of 43 doping peptides from equine urine prior to LC–MS screening

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dermorphin, growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP), TB-500 and their analogues have been used illegally in the horse racing industry to improve the performance of the horses. This study aims to present dispersive solid phase extraction (dSPE) as an alternative to solid phase extraction (SPE) for the clean-up of equine urine samples prior to liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) screening of 43 illegal performance enhancing peptides.

Methods

Sorbent types and mass, washing and eluting solvents were tested to obtain the optimal clean-up conditions for these peptides in horse urine matrices.

Results

The resulting dSPE clean-up method gave optimal recovery and reproducibility of 43 target peptides; for the first time dSPE is proven as a viable alternative to SPE and achieves limits of detection (LOD) that are sufficient for the screening of these peptides. The LODs for all dermorphin, TB-500 and GHRP peptides were 1 ng/mL. Recoveries of the 43 target analytes extracted from 3 spiked urine samples ranged from 8.9 to 58.8%. The intra-day and inter-day precision for all target analytes ranged from 0.6 to 24.1% and 1.4 to 27.8% respectively.

Conclusions

Using dSPE as a clean-up method, 43 peptide analytes of interest were successfully screened by LC–MS/MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (2018) International agreement on breeding, racing and wagering. Boulogne, France. https://www.ifhaonline.org/resources/ifAgreement.pdf. Last Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  2. Guan F, Robinson MA (2017) Comprehensive solid-phase extraction of multitudinous bioactive peptides from equine plasma and urine for doping detection. Anal Chim Acta 985:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.07.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas A, Höppner S, Geyer H, Schänzer W, Petrou M, Kwiatkowska D, Thevis M (2011) Determination of growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRP) and their major metabolites in human urine for doping controls by means of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:507–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4702-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Timms M, Hall N, Levina V, Vine J, Steel R (2014) A high-throughput LC-MS/MS screen for GHRP in equine and human urine, featuring peptide derivatization for improved chromatography. Drug Test Anal 6:985–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho EN, Kwok WH, Lau MY, Wong AS, Wan TS, Lam KK, Stewart BD (2012) Doping control analysis of TB-500, a synthetic version of an active region of thymosin 4, in equine urine and plasma by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1265:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazzarino M, Calvaresi V, de la Torre X, Parrotta G, Sebastianelli C, Botre F (2015) Development and validation of a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry procedure after solid-phase extraction for detection of 19 doping peptides in human urine. Forensic Toxicol 33:321–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-015-0279-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Steel R, Timms M, Levina V, Vine J (2014) A high throughput screen for 17 Dermorphin peptides in equine and human urine and equine plasma. Drug Test Anal 6:909–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Richards SL, Cawley AT, Raftery MJ (2013) Detection and quantification of dermorphin and selected analogs in equine urine. Bioanalysis 5:2995–3007. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.13.281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Semenistaya E, Zvereva I, Krotov G, Rodchenkov G (2016) Solid-phase extraction of small biologically active peptides on cartridges and microelution 96-well plates from human urine. Drug Test Anal 8:940–949. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Semenistaya E, Zvereva I, Thomas A, Thevis M, Krotova G, Rodchenkova G (2015) Determination of growth hormone releasing peptidesmetabolites in human urine after nasal administration of GHRP-1, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, Hexarelin, and Ipamorelin. Drug Test Anal 7:919–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guan F, Uboh CE, Soma LR, Robinson M, Maylin GA, Xiaoqing L (2013) Detection, quantification, and identification of dermorphin in equine plasma and urine by LC–MS/MS for doping control. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:4707–4717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6907-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, štajnbaher D (2003) Quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) approach for the determination of pesticide residues. WTQA 2002—18th annual waste testing and quality assurance symposium, Arlington 231–24. Doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.081

  13. Herrero P, Borrull F, Pocurull E, Marce RM (2014) A quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe extraction method followed by liquid chromatography-(Orbitrap) high resolution mass spectrometry to determine benzotriazole, benzothiazole and benzenesulfonamide derivates in sewage sludge. J Chromatogr A 1339:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Forsberg ND, Wilson GR, Anderson KA (2011) Determination of parent and substituted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in high-fat salmon using a modified QuEChERS extraction, dispersive SPE and GC-MS. J Agric Food Chem 59:8108–8116. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201745a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalachova K, Pulkrabova J, Drabova L, Cajka T, Kocourek V, Hajslova J (2011) Simplified and rapid determination of polychlorinated biphenyls, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish and shrimps integrated into a single method. Anal Chim Acta 707:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2011.09.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sapozhnikova Y, Lehotay SJ (2013) Multi-class, multi-residue analysis of pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polybrominated diphenyl ethers and novel flame retardants in fish using fast, low-pressure gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 758:80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li X, Guo Z, Sheng Q, Xuea X, Liang X (2012) Sequential elution of multiply and singly phosphorylated peptides with polar-copolymerized mixed-mode RP18/SCX material. Analyst 137:2774–2776. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2AN35247H

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cuervo D, Loli C, Fernández-Álvarez M, Muñoz G, Carreras D (2017) Determination of doping peptides via solid-phase microelution and accuratemass quadrupole time-of-flight LC–MS. J Chromatogr B 1065–1066:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.08.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mizoguchia H, Bagettab G, Sakuradac T, Sakurada S (2011) Dermorphin tetrapeptide analogs as potent and long-lasting analgesics with pharmacological profiles distinct from morphine. Peptides 32:421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2010.11.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferro P, Krotov G, Zvereva I, Rodchenkov G, Segura J (2016) Structure-activity relationship for peptídic growth hormone secretagogues. Drug Test Anal 9:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang CC, Hartmann-Fischbach P, Krueger TR, Wells TL, Feineman AR, Compton JC (2014) Fast and sensitive analysis of dermorphin and HYP6-dermorphin in equine plasma using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 6:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrade-Eiroa A, Canle M, Leroy-Cancellieri V, Cerdà V (2016) Solid phase extraction of organic compounds: a critical review. Part I. TrAC Trend Anal Chem 80:641–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dzomba F, Kugara J, Zaranyika MF (2015) Extraction of tetracycline antimicrobials from river water and sediment: a comparative study of three solid phase extraction methods. Afric J Pharm Parmacol 9:523–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall TG, Smukste I, Bresciano KR, Wang Y, McKearn D, Savage RE (2012) Identifying and overcoming matrix effects in drug discovery and development. In: Prasain JK (ed) Tandem mass spectrometry-applications and principles. IntechOpen, pp 389–421. https://doi.org/10.5772/32108

  25. Waters Corporation (2008) Oasis sample extraction products. Tauton, England. https://kinesis.co.uk/media/wysiwyg/knowledebase/pdf/720001692en-New-Oasis-brochure.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2019

  26. Minimum required performance levels for detection and identification of non-threshold substances,WADA Technical Document TD2015MRPL: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/science-medicine/td2015-mrpl, Accessed 31 July 2017

  27. Tiwari G, Tiwari R (2010) Bioanalytical method validation: an updated review. Parmaceut Method 1:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by funding from the ChemCentre and Edith Cowan University. We thank Dr. Rohan Steel from Racing Analytical Services Limited (RASL) (Victoria, Australia) for his inputs and providing peptide standards for our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thao T. Le.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Throughout this study horse urine samples were used. All urine samples were supplied by the ChemCentre which were sourced from Murdoch Veterinary School as a waste product. All applicable national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pugliese, J., Boyce, M.C., Lawler, N.G. et al. Dispersive SPE, an alternative to traditional SPE for extraction of 43 doping peptides from equine urine prior to LC–MS screening. Forensic Toxicol 38, 365–377 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00524-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00524-z

Keywords

Navigation